Choose Your Location
|
![]() |
Supporters say the bill would greatly lower the cost of buying a new home, but critics contend the measure would leave local governments without the resources they need to build more classrooms and roads.
The proposed impact fees, which originally were set at $8,000, remain far less than the cash contributions some localities require of at least $35,000 per house, called “proffers,” and it is not clear if the bill will win enough support to pass the Senate today.
“This is an extraordinarily comprehensive piece of legislation that will change the manner in which development indeed pays for the infrastructure needs that it creates,” said Sen. John Watkins, R-Powhatan, the sponsor of the bill.
But critics in local governments are pushing to have the measure blocked for further study, saying such a major overhaul needs more independent analysis.
“The fees are still way too low,” said Stewart Schwartz, executive director of the Coalition for Smarter Growth. “The fact that they’re throwing out numbers suggests that we need to study this more.”
Sen. George Barker, whose Northern Virginia district straddles the border between Prince William and Fairfax counties, said the changes have not satisfied all of his concerns.
“Prince William would receive far less under this measure than it currently does, and somebody else would have to pick that up,” said Barker, D-Fairfax. With the county considering a 28 percent increase in the property tax rate, he says taxpayers cannot afford to shoulder additional costs.
But the bill’s advocates say the fee would be paid by developers of more houses to spread out the cost.
“What we’re trying to do is spread the infrastructure funding over a larger base of units, which will lower the cost,” said Mark Granville-Smith, of the Prince William County Chapter of the Northern Virginia Building Association. “It’s a compromise meant to get governments on board.”
dgenz@dcexaminer.com



Comments from Examiner Readers
3:12 PM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008 re: "VDOT to curb cul-de-sac production, pushing congestion into neighborhoods"
Report as inappropriate
9:23 AM MST on Wed., Jun. 4, 2008
re: "VDOT to curb cul-de-sac production, pushing congestion into neighborhoods"
Report as inappropriate
6:23 AM MST on Wed., Feb. 13, 2008
re: "Developers increase impact fees in bid to save bill"
Report as inappropriate
DG-rad said:
What an Awesome proposal. This actually makes me proud of something that Virginia is doing regarding transportation. Finally, progress! Gotta love how the subtitle says "pushing congestion into neighborhoods", when really what this is doing is freeing congestion!
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Michael R. Shannon said:
The headline writer could not be more misguided. A grid street system reduces congestion by giving drivers options. The residents of the outlet streets, who get all the congestion now, should certainly welcome a grid. I've lived in Dallas, Oklahoma City, Tulsa, Houston, Ft. Worth and Odessa. All these cities are built on a grid system and none of them suffer the congestion in secondary streets that you encounter here. Why? Because if one road is blocked, there is a parallel one nearby that will get you to your destination, giving driver's options. More routes to destinations dilutes the traffic on any one road or street. Thank you VDOT. This is an excellent decision. I wish it was retroactive.
2 agree | 0 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree
Examiner Reader said:
The builder's are attempting to also include "by-right" divisions in "their" problems. That is wrong!
76 agree | 73 disagree
Vote on this comment: I agree or I disagree